Ambrose Aisabor, a retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police, has reiterated the necessity of implementing state police, labeling it as “non-negotiable.” Aisabor emphasized that the resurgence in calls for state police stems from the perceived shortcomings of the federal police apparatus.
Speaking to our correspondent, Aisabor highlighted the evolving security landscape, underscoring the urgency for state-level policing. He countered scepticism by pointing out that concerns regarding potential misuse by state governors mirror existing issues within the federal police structure.
“The argument is that state governors will misuse the outfit. Is the federal government not presently misusing the federal police?” Aisabor questioned. He further pointed to established models of multilevel policing in several advanced nations, advocating for robust checks and balances to prevent abuse of power.
Aisabor noted that most operational responsibilities of law enforcement are already shouldered by state governments, with only salary and allowance management falling under federal jurisdiction.
However, opposing views have emerged, notably from Ogun State’s Eselu of the Iselu kingdom, Oba Akintunde Akinyemi. The traditional ruler expressed reservations about decentralising policing, citing concerns over potential exploitation by state governors for political gain.
Oba Akinyemi voiced apprehension that state police could be utilised to intimidate opposition members within states, should it fall under gubernatorial control. Instead, he advocated for bolstering the existing federal police force through enhanced funding, equipment, and motivation.
The divergent opinions underscore the complexity of the ongoing discourse surrounding security reform in Nigeria, with stakeholders debating the merits and risks of transitioning to a state-based policing model.
